There's a difference between saying, "in the style of," and, for example, "inspired by." If you say the former, you're aligning your understanding *and* competence with that of the subject matter. Appreciation-of does not mean capacity-with. A legitimate in-the-style-of requires capacity, or at least humor.
THIS ENTIRE SITE Ⓒ 2010 rc.lam. ALL OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS HEREIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ARE COPYRIGHTED BY THE PHOTOGRAPHER. NO PART OF THIS SITE, OR ANY OF THE CONTENT CONTAINED HEREIN, MAY BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT EXPRESS PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S).
Flat, stiff, disjointed, with occasionally good line quality, but not where it counts.
ReplyDeletethanks for your comment, I appreciate your opinion.
ReplyDeleteThere's a difference between saying, "in the style of," and, for example, "inspired by." If you say the former, you're aligning your understanding *and* competence with that of the subject matter. Appreciation-of does not mean capacity-with. A legitimate in-the-style-of requires capacity, or at least humor.
ReplyDelete